How common is it for patients to tell a MS something and then with the attending present, say something completely different? Is it reasonable for an attending to hold the MS responsible for presenting what the patient said, then after being told something different by the patient, to comment in the final evaluation that the MS needs to work on correctly taking an accurate history and giving the MS a below expectations rating?
Furthermore, is it also reasonable for an attending to bad...
Are these reasonable?
Furthermore, is it also reasonable for an attending to bad...
Are these reasonable?